Imagine a compliance platform is $12,000 a year. How much is it?
The replacement it makes will decide the final answer.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be money well spent. The math would be different for a start-up of seven people could collect the same evidence in just a few minutes each month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Start by asking what platform comes with the most features. Think about what features allow your company to save time and effort.
The Break-Even point for automation
It’s not inherently good or evil. Its value varies with the size. Imagine a tech company that is growing, and has several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes in access. Gathering evidence manually could be a significant operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence could quickly justify their cost.
Now consider a 10-person startup making preparations for its first SOC 2. The system may be small, and evidence collection is still manageable even without significant automation.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. Although an advanced platform might provide a variety of capabilities however, they’re only useful when an organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a discussion which can be easily a feature by feature exercise. Both are well-established compliance platforms built around automation and integrations, so comparing their supported frameworks including integrations, service contracts, and individual quotations can be useful for organizations searching for that method.
You’ll have to decide on another thing first. Do you want to use a system for compliance that is integrated? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
Many Vanta competitors are also in the same class that focuses on automation. It also offers lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes the framework controls into a central workspace. It also offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers select and upload the proof they wish to share.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
The removal of integrations comes with a clear disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence by hand.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and this means that the compliance application does not require connections to the operational environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. It is crucial to determine what tradeoffs are appropriate to your business.
CertAssist is targeted at groups of roughly five to 200 individuals. It also publishes its prices rather than needing for a sales meeting to get the initial figure. The launch price is $225 a month, which is a significant reduction from the standard price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Be In Control
Needs for startups today with 10 employees aren’t necessarily exactly the same as the company that has 100 or 500 employees.
Compliance can be maintained with an easy platform. The economics of automation can increase as systems, employees and frameworks multiply. Let complexity take its place when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations simply because they appear impressive on the chart of comparison. You should purchase them only when the cost of doing the task manually is higher.
